MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168189562 · doi:10.1115/esda2014-20343

New Schoenflies-Motion Manipulator Implementing Isosceles Triangle and Delassus Parallelogram

2014· article· en· W2168189562 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chung-Ching Lee, Jacques M. Hervé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science CouncilMcGill University
KeywordsParallelogramIsosceles triangleGenerator (circuit theory)Topology (electrical circuits)Translation (biology)Rotation (mathematics)Motion (physics)Parallel manipulatorComputer scienceRotation around a fixed axisMathematicsPhysicsCombinatoricsGeometryRobotArtificial intelligenceClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schoenflies (X) motion is a 4D displacement Lie group including a spatial translation and any rotation whose axis is parallel to a given direction. Delassus parallelogram has four parallel screw (H) pairs with related pitches and the isosceles triangle is a special HHHP. After merging these two chains, an HHH-//-HHH generator of 2-DoF translation along a right helicoid is derived. It produces a 2-DoF motion mathematically modeled by a 2D submanifold of a 4D group of X-motion. Because of the product closure in an X-group, the 4-DoF generator with HHH-//-HHH loop serving as a subchain is revealed by adding two H pairs with axes parallel to fixed H axes. Parallel arrangement of two generators of the same X motion results in a new Schoenflies-motion manipulator with hybrid topology for 4-DoF pick-and-place operations. Four fixed H pairs (two double Hs) can actuate this manipulator and the two coaxial Hs must have distinct pitches. In addition, the possible design choices of special architectures are introduced for practical applications. Computer simulations of the new parallel manipulator with Schoenflies motion verify the effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207