MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168200807 · doi:10.1136/ard.2007.072157

EULAR evidence-based recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases

2007· article· en· W2168200807 on OpenAlexaff
Jos N. Hoes, Johannes W. G. Jacobs, Maarten Boers, DT Boumpas, Frank Buttgereit, N. Caeyers, Ernest Choy, Maurizio Cutolo, José António Pereira da Silva, Greet Esselens, Loı̈c Guillevin, Ingiäld Hafström, John Kirwan, J Rovenský, Anthony S. Russell, Kenneth G. Saag, Björn Svensson, René Westhovens, H. Zeidler, J. W. J. Bijlsma

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineGlucocorticoidSystemic therapyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.089
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.130
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0890.130
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.016
Bibliometrics0.0110.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0160.005
Research integrity0.0270.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations408
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesSame topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesFrench-language works237,207