MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168205063 · doi:10.7202/1033190ar

Précarité des populations francophones âgées vivant en situation linguistique minoritaire

2015· article· fr· W2168205063 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Louise Bouchard, Malek Batal, Pascal Imbeault, Golnaz Sedigh, Erika E. Silva, Ewa Sucha

Bibliographic record

VenueMinorités linguistiques et société · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le vieillissement des populations s’est considérablement accentué ces dernières décennies et ce plus particulièrement pour la population francophone vivant en situation linguistique minoritaire au Canada. Nos analyses secondaires de l’Enquête sur la santé des collectivités canadiennes (ESCC) révèlent qu’une grande proportion d’aînés francophones n’a pas de diplôme d’études secondaires et se situe dans le quintile de revenu le plus faible. Des analyses multidimensionnelles des données montrent que les déterminants de la pauvreté tels que le revenu et l’éducation exercent une influence sur la pauvreté des personnes âgées, mais que la langue et l’appartenance à la minorité francophone y contribuent de façon spécifique, ce qui constitue une donnée nouvelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinorités linguistiques et sociétéSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207