Distribution and immunotoxicity by intravenous injection of iron nanoparticles in a murine model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increased application of iron oxide nanoparticles (FeNPs) for biomedical imaging purposes, concerns regarding the onset of the unexpected adverse health effects following exposure have been rapidly raised. In this study, we investigated the tissue distribution and immunotoxicity of FeNPs (2 and 4 mg kg(-1)) over time (2, 4 and 13 weeks) after single intravenous injection. At 13 weeks after a single injection, the iron levels increased in all measured tissues compared to the control, and iron accumulation was notable in the liver, spleen and thymus. These changes were accompanied by changes in levels of redox reaction-related elements, including copper, manganese, zinc and cobalt. In addition, as compared to the control, the number of white blood cells and percentage of neutrophils significantly increased in the treated groups, and the interleukin-8 secretion and lactate dehydrogenase release were clearly elevated in the treated groups along with enhanced expressions of chemotaxis-related proteins. However, expression of antigen presenting related proteins attenuated following accumulation of FeNPs. Taken together, we suggest that FeNPs may primarily induce toxicity in the liver and immune system, and immunotoxicological evaluation should be considered to predict adverse health effects following exposure to NPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it