Disturbance rejection in adaptive control for a class of nonlinear mechanical systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents hybrid control strategy for robust trajectory tracking control for a class of uncertain nonlinear mechanical systems. The design combines adaptive fuzzy system with robust adaptive control algorithm. Adaptive fuzzy system approximates unknown nonlinear system dynamics while a robustifying adaptive control term is used to cope with uncertainties due to the presence of external disturbance, modeling error and other unmodeled dynamical effects. Using the Lyapunov method, we first develop a stable hybrid controller by assuming that the system output and its derivatives are available for feedback control design. Then, an output feedback form of the position-velocity (state feedback) hybrid controller is proposed where the unknown velocity signal is replaced by the output of a model-free linear estimator. We prove that the tracking error bound under output feedback design can converge asymptotically to the tracking error bound achieved under the state feedback control design. Finally, the proposed method is implemented and evaluated on a 3-DOF Phantom™ medical mechatronics system to demonstrate the theoretical development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".