MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168238105 · doi:10.1109/waina.2008.43

Wireless Service Attributes Classification and Matching Mechanism Based on Decision Tree

2008· article· en· W2168238105 on OpenAlexaff
Min Peng, Laurence T. Yang, Wuqing Zhao, Naixue Xiong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Packet Processing and Optimization
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision treeComputer scienceMatching (statistics)Tree (set theory)WirelessNode (physics)Service (business)Data miningWireless networkIncremental decision treeDecision tree learningBinary decision diagramDecision tree modelComputer networkDecision ruleArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, SeviceCuts, a decision tree based model is proposed, considering the special attributes of wireless service and the normal need of users, helping service decision agent classify the wireless services adaptively. The decision tree is traversed based on some searching rule. A small number of matching rules are stored in the leaf node, which contain the most matching service strategies to users, and are linearly traversed to find the highest priority rule that matches the user's query requirement. The analysis of algorithm complication and performance shows that the efficiency of ServiceCuts decision tree model is better than traditional linear search structure and the normal binary decision tree structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207