MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168330920 · doi:10.7202/706050ar

Sensitivity distribution of Venturia inaequalis to fenarimol in Québec apple orchards

2005· article· en· W2168330920 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Odile Carisse, Johanne Pelletier

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenturia inaequalisApple scabFungicideHorticultureBiologyOrchardBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was initiated to quantify the baseline sensitivity of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) to fenarimol, an ergosterol synthesis-inhibiting fungicide. In 1988, 576 monoconidial isolates of Venturia inaequalis were collected from 26 commercial orchards throughout Quebec. Sensitivity to fenarimol was assessed by radial growth inhibition assay. The ED50 values for the 26 orchards ranged from 0.024 to 5.212 (μ g mL-1 with a mean ED50 of 0.156 μg ml-1. Reduced sensitivity, expressed as ED50, was found in three orchards for an overall frequency of 4.51% of isolates. Sensitive isolates had a mean ED50 of 0.079 μg ml-1, whereas isolates with reduced sensitivity had a mean ED50 of 1.714 μ g mL-1, yielding a resistance factor of about 22. Four populations were identified based on the frequency distribution of ED50 values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFrench-language works237,207