La lecture interactive d’albums pour les élèves du préscolaire ayant des difficultés langagières : une intervention prometteuse pour améliorer le vocabulaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude évalue l’impact d’une adaptation de la Lecture interactive d’albums (Wasik & Bond, 2001) sur le vocabulaire et sur certaines habiletés langagières d’élèves du préscolaire ayant un retard sévère de langage (n = 7). L’intervention (5 semaines) combinait des méthodes d’apprentissage implicite et explicite à travers la lecture d’histoire. Un test t à échantillons appariés montre une amélioration significative du vocabulaire réceptif et des réseaux sémantiques. Ainsi, l’étude met en lumière une dichotomie entre le développement des versants réceptif et expressif et démontre la possibilité d’implanter une intervention en vocabulaire en contexte de classe.--------------------------------------------------------------------This study aims to measure the impact of an adaptation of the Interactive Book Reading (Wasik & Bond, 2001) on vocabulary and other related language abilities of kindergarteners with language impairment (LI) (n = 7). The intervention (5 weeks) involved indirect and direct instruction through book reading. A t-test for paired sample shows a significant improvement of receptive vocabulary and semantic networks. These results indicate a dichotomy between the production and the comprehension of words. Further directions for vocabulary intervention through book reading with LI children will be discussed in light of the results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".