MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168375829 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2004.1353934

Local thresholding of composite documents using multi-layer perceptron nerual network

2004· article· en· W2168375829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThresholdingComputer sciencePixelArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)PerceptronArtificial neural networkFeature (linguistics)Image (mathematics)Layer (electronics)Multilayer perceptronComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bi-level thresholding of document images with poor contrast, non-uniform illumination, complex background patterns and non-uniformly distributed backgrounds is a challenging problem that researchers have been trying to solve. The problem is that different algorithms tend to yield different results based on the assumptions made to the images content. A new binarization algorithm is proposed to deal with such images. The algorithm proposed uses statistical and texture feature measures to obtain a feature vector from a pixel window of size (2n+1)/spl times/(2n+1), it then uses a multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLP NN) to classify each pixel value in the image. The proposed method performed better than existing global and local thresholding techniques and works on different variety of images. The algorithm provides a local understanding of pixels from its neighborhood. This new method that uses NN and works on scanned documents with non-uniform backgrounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it