Applications of the hybrid FDTD and ADI-FDTD method to planar circuit structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the original FDTD was reported in 1966 (K.S. Yee, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-14, pp. 302-307, 1966), FDTD based methods have been developed and applied to many structures successfully (A.Taflove, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite Difference Time Domain Method, Boston: Artech House, 1995.). Among them is the ADI-FDTD (T. Namiki, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theo. Tech., vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2003-2007, 1999; F. Zheng et al, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theo. Tech., vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1550-1558, 2000). Due to its CFL independence as compared to FDTD, it is getting increased attention. In this paper, we numerically validate that the hybrid ADI-FDTD and FDTD is efficient to compute planar structures. It shows that the hybrid method can be about 3 times faster in simulation time at almost the same memory requirement and accuracy level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it