MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168421325 · doi:10.1017/s1462399408000550

The mucopolysaccharidoses: a success of molecular medicine

2008· review· en· W2168421325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersChild and Family Research Institute
KeywordsEnzyme replacement therapyLysosomal storage disordersLysosomal storage diseaseDiseaseHunter syndromeMedicinePhenotypeBioinformaticsGeneBiologyGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mucopolysaccharidoses represent a devastating group of lysosomal storage diseases affecting approximately 1 in 25 000 individuals. Advances in biochemistry and genetics over the past 25 years have resulted in the identification of the key hydrolases underlying the mucopolysaccharidoses, with subsequent isolation and characterisation of the genes involved. Ultimately these advances have led to the recent development of specific treatment regimens for some of the mucopolysaccharidoses, in the form of direct enzyme replacement. Direct replacement of the defective gene product has been attempted for very few genetic disorders, and thus the experience gained in the lysosomal storage diseases by the development, evaluation and integration of treatment regimens into healthcare is instructive for other rare genetic disorders. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of the mucopolysaccharidoses and highlights the complex biochemical and physiological perturbations that underlie the disease phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it