MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168444669 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5684175

Optimal Precoder and Symbol Grouping for Bandwidth-Efficient Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation over NAF Single-Relay Channels

2010· article· en· W2168444669 on OpenAlexaff
Nghi H. Tran, Leonardo Jiménez Rodríguez, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingRelayComputer scienceCoding gainAlgorithmDiversity gainPhase-shift keyingUpper and lower boundsBit error rateMathematicsMIMOTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsFadingPower (physics)Channel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the precoder design for a bandwidth-efficient bit-interleaved coded modulation (BICM) over non-orthogonal amplify-and-forward (NAF) single-relay channels with an arbitrary length of cooperative frame 2N. Based on the tight union bound on the bit error probability (BEP), we first derive an asymptotic design criterion with regard to a general 2N × 2N rotation matrix. This expression allows us to develop a class of precoder that not only achieves full cooperative diversity but also optimizes the asymptotic error performance. Interestingly, the developed class of optimal precoder indicates that the source should be kept silent in the cooperative phase. In the broadcasting phase, it is shown that power is distributed equally to 2N information symbols at the source. By further examining the structure of the optimal class of 2N × 2N precoders, we then reveal that precoding over a group of at least 2 information symbols is sufficient to fully exploit diversity and coding advantages. Such precoding technique, which is referred to as symbol grouping, therefore significantly reduces the system complexity without degrading the error performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207