MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168455767 · doi:10.1080/10824000509480600

Integrating Heterogeneous Traveler Information Using Web Services

2005· article· en· W2168455767 on OpenAlexaff
Shanzhen Yi, Bo Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of GIS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSOAPXMLInformation integrationWorld Wide WebMetadataInformation systemDatabaseWeb serviceEfficient XML InterchangeEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various types of information, e.g. weather, road and traffic conditions, can assist travelers in making better-informed decisions about their trips. The information is widely disseminated by distributed data sources and web sites. The integration of such information would provide significant value-added services to travelers, and XML-related technologies have proven to be effective to achieve this goal. This paper aims to design and implement an integrated system to make use of widely distributed traveller information by employing the XML and Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) techniques. The prototype system adopts a three-tier architecture and is implemented using integrated Java technologies. The shared XML schema for geo-referenced data provides a foundation for heterogeneous information integration. The XML wrappers, the metadata schema, and the visualization tools were developed to provide information services based on the heterogeneous data sources. Two examples concerning travel information query and route selection, respectively, are presented to illustrate the applicability of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of GISSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207