Évaluation statique des délits violents chez les délinquants sexuels incarcérés en Belgique francophone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'étude compare, à travers des variables statiques, des comportements anti- sociaux chez trois groupes de délinquants sexuels incarcérés en Belgique francophone. Les trois groupes étaient constitués de (1) 51 violeurs, (2) 46 abuseurs sur mineurs et (3) 41 auteurs d'inceste. Les variables concernaient : (a) le niveau de condamnation ; (b) l'âge relatif aux derniers faits ; (c) le nombre et (d) le type de délits violents et non violents ; (e) le nombre total et (f) le type de victimes. Les résultats suggèrent que par rapport aux deux autres groupes, les violeurs sont plus jeunes et manifestent un nombre plus élevé de délits généraux et violents en particulier. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats sont congruents avec les données de la littérature qui suggèrent que par rapport aux autres catégories de délinquants sexuels, les violeurs manifestent davantage de comportements antisociaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".