MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168483857 · doi:10.1109/tns.2015.2409783

Real-Time Discrete SPAD Array Readout Architecture for Time of Flight PET

2015· article· en· W2168483857 on OpenAlexaff
Marc‐André Tétrault, Etienne Desaulniers Lamy, Alexandre Boisvert, Christian Thibaudeau, Moez Kanoun, Frédérik Dubois, Réjean Fontaine, J.‐F. Pratte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscriminatorDetectorNuclear electronicsAvalanche photodiodeElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareSilicon photomultiplierDead timeData acquisitionElectrical engineeringScintillatorComputer sciencePhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) arrays have proven themselves as serious candidates for time of flight positron emission tomography (PET). Discrete SPAD readout schemes mitigate the low-noise requirements of analog schemes and offer very fine control over threshold levels and timing pickup strategies. On the other hand, a high optical fill factor is paramount to timing performance in such detectors, and consequently space is limited for closely integrated electronics. Nonetheless, a production, daily used PET scanner must minimize bandwidth usage, data volume, data analysis time and power consumption and therefore requires a real-time readout and data processing architecture as close to the detector as possible. We propose a fully digital, embedded real-time readout architecture for SPAD-based detector. The readout circuit is located directly under the SPAD array instead of within or beside it to overcome the fill factor versus circuit capabilities tradeoff. Since the overall real-time engine provides all the required data processing, the system needs only to send the data required by the PET coincidence engine, significantly reducing the bandwidth requirement. A 3D prototype device was implemented in 2 tiers of 130 nm CMOS from Global Foundry / Tezzaron featuring individual readout for 6 scintillator channels. The timing readout is provided by a first photon discriminator and a 31 ps resolution time to digital converter, while energy readout and event packaging is done in real-time using synchronous logic from a CMOS standard cell library, all fully embedded in the ASIC. The dedicated serial output line supports a sustained rate 2.2 Mcps in PET acquisition mode, or 170 kcps in an oscilloscope mode for offline validation and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207