MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168519592 · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20886

The mineralized osteocyte: A living fossil

2008· article· en· W2168519592 on OpenAlexaff
Lynne Bell, M. V. Kayser, Christopher Jones

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorWellcome Trust
KeywordsOsteocyteMineralized tissuesGeologyEarth scienceEnvironmental scienceBiologyDentistryMedicineBiochemistryDentin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report here on an enigmatic and biologically mysterious event in which a single cell, the osteocyte, mineralizes in vivo and in this process the cell's organelles, cytoskeleton and membrane, are mineralized in a dying state. That the bony lacuna in which the lone osteocyte resides becomes infilled with mineral in vivo is not a new observation and was noted by early microscopists. This study has applied scanning and transmission electron microscopy to modern, archaeological, and fossil bone to investigate the mineral and organic structure and content of this cell. The results from this study revealed that within this mineral lies a visibly identifiable cell, which has an apoptotic-like morphology. The mechanisms by which this cell mineralizes are so intimate chemically that remnant cell organelles, membranes, cytoskeleton, and potentially nucleic bodies are morphologically identifiable. We have further identified mineralized osteocytes surviving in archaeological and fossil mammal bone up to 5 million years BP. The significance of our findings demonstrates that a single cell may itself mineralize in vivo via an unknown set of biochemical events. Importantly, the location and survival of extra cellular and cellular proteins, including nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in bone after death, has been an area of some speculation, and this unique fossil cell provides a preservation locus within human and mammalian bone, which might be fruitfully targeted in future biomolecular studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physical AnthropologySame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207