MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168578757 · doi:10.1155/2011/346298

On a Fractional Master Equation

2011· article· en· W2168578757 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anitha Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Differential Equations · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesMcGill University
KeywordsMathematicsFractional calculusMittag-Leffler functionLaplace transformLaplace's equationDiffusion equationMathematical analysisGreen's function for the three-variable Laplace equationFunction (biology)Integer (computer science)Wave equationOrder (exchange)Integro-differential equationPartial differential equationFirst-order partial differential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fractional order time‐independent form of the wave equation or diffusion equation in two dimensions is obtained from the standard time‐independent form of the wave equation or diffusion equation in two‐dimensions by replacing the integer order partial derivatives by fractional Riesz‐Feller derivative and Caputo derivative of order α, β, 1 < ℜ(α) ≤ 2 and 1 < ℜ(β) ≤ 2 respectively. In this paper, we derive an analytic solution for the fractional time‐independent form of the wave equation or diffusion equation in two dimensions in terms of the Mittag‐Leffler function. The solutions to the fractional Poisson and the Laplace equations of the same kind are obtained, again represented by means of the Mittag‐Leffler function. In all three cases, the solutions are represented also in terms of Fox′s H‐function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Differential EquationsSame topicFractional Differential Equations SolutionsFrench-language works237,207