MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168580983 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604994103

Akt1 deficiency affects neuronal morphology and predisposes to abnormalities in prefrontal cortex functioning

2006· article· en· W2168580983 on OpenAlexaff
Wen‐Sung Lai, Bin Xu, Koen G.C. Westphal, Marta Paterlini, Berend Olivier, Paul Pavlidis, Maria Karayiorgou, Joseph A. Gogos

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionUniversity of PennsylvaniaMcKnight Foundation
KeywordsPrefrontal cortexNeurochemicalNeuroscienceBiologyPsychologyCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is accumulating evidence that AKT signaling plays a role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. We asked whether Akt1 deficiency in mice results in structural and functional abnormalities in prefrontal cortex (PFC). Exploratory transcriptional profiling revealed concerted alterations in the expression of PFC genes controlling synaptic function, neuronal development, myelination, and actin polymerization, and follow-up ultrastructural analysis identified consistent changes in the dendritic architecture of pyramidal neurons. Behavioral analysis indicated that Akt1-mutant mice have normal acquisition of a PFC-dependent cognitive task but abnormal working memory retention under neurochemical challenge of three distinct neurotransmitter systems. Thus, Akt1 deficiency creates a context permissive for gene-gene and gene-environment interactions that modulate PFC functioning and contribute to the disease risk associated with this locus, the severity of the clinical syndrome, or both.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations149
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207