Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bayeux Tapestry and the Song of Roland RITING AROUND 1067, Guy of Amiens described in his Carmen de Hastingae Proelio how a certain "mimus" rode before the assembled French troops at Hastings and juggled with his sword.The purpose of this bravado performance was to hearten the French and terrify the English.An infuriated English knight rode forward to rid the field of this arrogant intruder, but he was swept from his horse by the lance of "Incisor-ferri" and, losing his head, became instead the first trophy of the battle. 1 Some sixty years later the incident had assumed a different dimension when William of Malmesbury indicated that the story of Roland was sung before the French at Hastings to serve as an example of valour to those who were about to face a fight that could end only in victory or death. 2 It is not surprising that Wace, writing between 1160 and 1174, combined the two stories, and that the juggling knight "Taillefer" was said to have had the Song of Roland on his lips as he faced the army.All that this proves, of course, is that the story of Roland's valor and death at Roncevaux was a popular model of military heroism during the twelfth century.It is difficult to imagine how the poem, as we have it, could have been performed while two armies were poised and ready to attack each other.Nevertheless, the Song of Roland has been associated with the Normans and Hastings by many subsequent historians.The references in the poem to Norman activities in England, Scotland, Italy, and Sicily have tended to reinforce this association.4 Moreover, the values reflected in the Song of Roland belong not to the eighth, but to the late eleventh century, as the actual events and personalities of the original occurrence were transformed to carry contemporary relevance.On the other hand, the embroidery popularly known as the Bayeux Tapestry would appear to present a straightforward visualization of the events leading up to and culminating in the English defeat at Hastings on October 14,1066.The Tapestry begins with King Edward advising Harold Godwinson to undertake a journey to Normandy, presumably to reaffirm to Duke William that he, William, had been promised the English crown if Edward were to die childless.It now ends with the English defeat at Hastings, but unfortunately this end is badly damaged, and we have no 339 W
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".