MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168630956 · doi:10.1002/rob.1044

Brief communication: Uniform ultimate boundedness of a fuzzy logic controlled industrial robot

2001· article· en· W2168630956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Robotic Systems · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicControl theory (sociology)Scheme (mathematics)Control engineeringRoboticsTrajectoryCompensation (psychology)Controller (irrigation)RobotTorqueTracking (education)Computer scienceFuzzy control systemFuzzy electronicsTask (project management)Industrial robotEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)MathematicsNeuro-fuzzy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article addresses the proof of uniform ultimate boundedness of a fuzzy logic controller plus a computed torque control scheme applied to trajectory tracking control of robotic manipulators. Further improvement of the performance of this fuzzy logic control scheme is achieved through automatic tuning of a weight parameter α leading to a self‐tuning fuzzy logic compensator. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the computed torque and fuzzy compensation scheme, as well as the self‐tuning fuzzy logic controller, applied to an industrial CRS Robotics Corporation A460 robot during a trajectory tracking task. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it