MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168634994 · doi:10.1111/bph.13014

An analysis of glucocorticoid receptor‐mediated gene expression in <scp>BEAS‐2B</scp> human airway epithelial cells identifies distinct, ligand‐directed, transcription profiles with implications for asthma therapeutics

2014· article· en· W2168634994 on OpenAlexafffund
Taruna Joshi, Malcolm Johnson, Robert Newton, M A Giembycz

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGlucocorticoid receptorGlucocorticoidAgonistGene expressionHormone response elementInflammationTranscription factorBiologyImmunologyRegulation of gene expressionReceptorPharmacologyGeneCell biologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: International asthma guidelines recommend that inhaled glucocorticoids be used as a monotherapy in all patients with mild to moderate disease because of their ability to suppress airways inflammation. Current evidence suggests that the therapeutic benefit of glucocorticoids is due to the transactivation and transrepression of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory genes respectively. However, the extent to which clinically relevant glucocorticoids are equivalent in their ability to modulate gene expression is unclear. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A pharmacodynamics investigation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene transactivation in BEAS-2B human airway epithelial cells was performed using a glucocorticoid response element luciferase reporter coupled with an analysis of glucocorticoid-inducible genes encoding proteins with anti-inflammatory and adverse-effect potential. KEY RESULTS: Using transactivation as a functionally relevant output, a given glucocorticoid displayed a unique, gene expression 'fingerprint' where intrinsic efficacy and GR density were essential determinants. We showed that depending on the gene selected for analysis, a given glucocorticoid can behave as an antagonist, partial agonist, full agonist or even 'super agonist'. In the likely event that different, tissue-dependent gene expression profiles are reproduced in vivo, then the anti-inflammatory and adverse-effect potential of many glucocorticoids currently available as asthma therapeutics may not be equivalent. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The generation of gene expression 'fingerprints' in target and off-target human tissues could assist the rational design of GR agonists with improved therapeutic ratios. This approach could identify compounds that are useful in the management of severe asthma and other inflammatory disorders where systemic exposure is desirable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207