MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168655241 · doi:10.1109/6144.910807

Bonding stress and reliability of high power GaAs-based lasers

2001· article· en· W2168655241 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Lisak, Daniel T. Cassidy, A. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJDSU (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSolderingHeat sinkAdhesiveEpoxyComposite materialEutectic systemLaserThermal conductivityThermal expansionStress (linguistics)Electrical conductorOptoelectronicsAlloyOpticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GaAs-based lasers were bonded to oxygen-free high-conductivity (OFHC) copper heat sinks using a eutectic PbSn solder or a silver-filled conductive epoxy, and life tested. Epoxy-bonded devices were observed to have a larger failure rate on life test than solder-bonded devices. Bonding stress, as measured by the degree of polarization (DOP) of photoluminescence, was found to be the largest in epoxy-bonded devices. As well, the type of heat sink and bonding adhesive affected the stress in the laser material, with bonding stress increasing when there was a larger mismatch of coefficients of thermal expansion between the laser material, adhesive, and heat sink. Results suggested that heat sink material and bonding adhesive contribute to stress within the laser material and the resulting performance of the device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging TechnologiesSame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207