MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168670366 · doi:10.5194/npg-14-317-2007

A novel iterative approach for mapping local singularities from geochemical data

2007· article· en· W2168670366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinear processes in geophysics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingularityGravitational singularityMultifractal systemGeologyMathematicsMathematical analysisFractal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. There are many phenomena in nature, such as earthquakes, landslides, floods, and large-scale mineralization that are characterized by singular functions exhibiting scale invariant properties. A local singularity analysis based on multifractal modeling was developed for detection of local anomalies for mineral exploration. An iterative approach is proposed in the current paper for improvement of parameter estimations involved in the local singularity analysis. The advantage of this new approach is demonstrated with de Wijs's zinc data from a sphalerite-quartz vein near Pulacayo in Bolivia. The semivariogram method was used to illustrate the differences between the raw data and the estimated data by the new algorithm. It has been shown that the outcome of the local singularity analysis consists of two components: singularity component characterized by local singularity index and the non-singular component by prefractal parameter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it