MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168679421 · doi:10.1109/robot.2007.363783

Kinematic Analysis of the Spherically Actuated Platform Manipulator

2007· article· en· W2168679421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsInverse kinematicsSingularityControl theory (sociology)Mechanism (biology)ActuatorKinematics equationsDegrees of freedom (physics and chemistry)Forward kinematicsInverseParallel manipulatorComputer scienceRobot kinematicsMathematicsRobotMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceGeometryClassical mechanicsPhysicsMobile robotControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New methods for the inverse and forward kinematic analysis of the novel six degrees of freedom (6DOF) parallel manipulator which has only two legs are presented. The actuation of the new mechanism is through two base-mounted spherical actuators. In the inverse pose kinematic, active joint variables are directly calculated with no need for the evaluation of passive joint variables. In the forward pose kinematic, closed form solution adopting a new approach is presented. It is shown that the inverse and forward pose kinematic have sixteen and four different solutions, respectively. Moreover, closed form equations for the rate kinematic analysis are proposed. Finally, two different categories of the singularity points for the new mechanism with their geometrical interpretation are introduced. In one category the mechanism loses one or more DOF while in the other one it gains one or more DOF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it