Fabrication Process for Electromagnetic Actuators Compatible with Polymer Based Microfluidic Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We demonstrate a new hybrid-soft-lithography micromolding process that results in a mechanically-compliant, magnetically actuated membrane. The new microactuator consists of a thin undoped polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membrane with a central magnet feature, which is also micromolded using soft lithography. The central magnet is composed of a magnetic nanocomposite polymer (M-NCP) material, which is achieved by uniformly dispersing rare earth magnetic powder (MQP-12-5) in the PDMS polymer matrix. The hybrid fabrication technique is capable of realizing a highly flexible membrane with the ability of providing bidirectional deflection without sacrificing the transparency of the device, which may be required for many biomedical applications. Furthermore, we show that the hybrid process also yields improved deflection of the membrane using lower magnetic fields than an opaque membrane fabricated entirely in nanocomposite polymer. These lower fields are more suitable to on-chip production of microactuators excited via electronic signals in microcoils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".