MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168700653 · doi:10.1109/cimsa.2003.1227198

Evolutionary neural network-based sensor self-calibration scheme using IEEE 1451 and wireless sensor networks

2004· article· en· W2168700653 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceKey distribution in wireless sensor networksScalabilityIntelligent sensorVisual sensor networkArtificial neural networkReal-time computingPlug and playInterface (matter)Scheme (mathematics)Mobile wireless sensor networkWirelessEmbedded systemComputer networkWireless networkArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plug-and-play sensor self-calibrating technology is presented in this paper. The solution involves the evolution and tuning of a neural network (NN), through a genetic algorithm (GA). The former is utilized to interface to a sensor, on-board a robotic sensor agent. Multiple NN interfaces can be utilized for multiple sensors, hence providing for a parallel and scalable system. The system introduces the "sense remotely, actuate immediately" concept, along with an analysis of a completely pervasive and sentient environment, in which sensors provide the user with real-time and wireless sensory information, while actuators provision for the user's response to the filtered data, streaming from the plethora of intelligent sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it