MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cloning of a Novel Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase Subunit Expressed in the Fibrous Cap of Human Atherosclerotic Plaque

2003· article· en· W2168707042 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Van Den Diepstraten, Karen D. Papay, Zuzana Bolender, Arthur Brown, J. Geoffrey Pickering

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein subunitHydroxylationRecombinant DNAG alpha subunitCloning (programming)Molecular biologyGeneEnzymeBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The production of collagen is fundamental to atherosclerosis and critically dependent on posttranslational modification by prolyl 4-hydroxylase. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report the cloning of a novel prolyl 4-hydroxylase catalytic (alpha) subunit from human vascular smooth muscle cells. The peptide displayed conservation of critical residues for interacting with Fe2+ and 2-oxoglutarate, essential cosubstrates for prolyl 4-hydroxylase activity. Furthermore, when the recombinant protein was expressed in cells, it associated with the beta-subunit of prolyl 4-hydroxylase and could catalyze prolyl 4-hydroxylation of a collagen-like peptide. The tissue distribution was dissimilar from that of the 2 previously cloned alpha-subunits, suggesting a role beyond redundancy. Importantly, the novel gene was expressed in the fibrous cap of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The discovery of a novel prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha-subunit, here termed the alpha(III)-subunit, suggests a new participant in collagen synthesis that, in view of the expression findings, may be relevant to atherosclerotic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207