MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168708442 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2004.1429261

Stabilization of networked control systems with data packet dropout and network delays via switching system approach

2004· article· en· W2168708442 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mei Yu, Long Wang, Tianguang Chu, Guangming Xie

Bibliographic record

Venue2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsDropout (neural networks)Control theory (sociology)Network packetComputer scienceNetworked control systemStability (learning theory)State (computer science)Control systemLinear systemControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringAlgorithmComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An iterative approach is proposed to model networked control systems (NCSs) with arbitrary but finite data packet dropout. as switched linear systems. This enables us to apply the rich theory of switched systems to analyzing such NCSs. Sufficient conditions are presented on the stability and stabilization of NCSs with packet dropout and network delays. Stabilizing state/output feedback controllers can be constructed by using the feasible solutions of some linear matrix inequalities. The merit of the iterative approach is that the controllers can make full use of the previous information to stabilize NCSs when the current state measurements can not be transmitted by the network channel instantly. A simulation example is worked out to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations222
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601)Same topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207