MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168724353 · doi:10.1109/aina.2008.77

PACONET: imProved  Ant Colony Optimization Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc NETworks

2008· article· en· W2168724353 on OpenAlexafffund
Eseosa Osagie, Parimala Thulasiraman, Ruppa K. Thulasiram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingComputer networkAd hoc On-Demand Distance Vector RoutingAnt colony optimization algorithmsWireless Routing ProtocolOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolDynamic Source RoutingDistance-vector routing protocolLink-state routing protocolDistributed computingMobile ad hoc networkRouting protocolWireless ad hoc networkRouting (electronic design automation)AlgorithmWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETS) are infrastructureless network consisting of mobile nodes, with constantly changing topologies, that communicate via a wireless medium. Therefore, routing is a challenging issue in MANETs. Recently, nature inspired algorithms have been explored as means of finding an efficient solution to this routing problem. In this paper, we develop an improved routing algorithm for MANETs based on Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) inspired by real ants. The performance of the routing algorithm is evaluated through simulation and is compared to an existing well known MANET routing protocol, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV). Several performance metrics are considered in different scenarios with varying mobility levels and traffic load.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207