Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retributive approaches to confronting harmful acts like suspected sexual abuse (SSA) have often been the norm in contemporary Western cultures. Alternative restorative approaches partly inspired by indigenous traditions are growing. Conferencing, one of these restorative approaches, is the focus of our conceptual exploration in this paper. We concentrate on cases of how conferencing may be useful when traditional therapeutic approaches fail. In conferencing, it is typically the case that the person responsible for harmful acts acknowledges this. For SSA, however, we argue that the focus should rather be on the victim's suffering and alleviation of her/his harm, especially for the children. Martin Buber's I-It vs. I-Thou conceptual ideas serve as useful constructs for describing how conferencing invites a holistic approach in difficult and highly conflictual situations where conventional retributive and therapeutic approaches may fail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it