MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168794742 · doi:10.1139/b07-029

From genes to patterns: Auxin distribution and auxin-dependent gene regulation in plant pattern formation

2007· article· en· W2168794742 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Naden T. Krogan, Thomas Berleth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAuxinPlant hormoneBiologyTranscription factorPlant developmentCell biologyComputational biologyHormoneGeneGeneticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has long been recognized that the plant hormone auxin plays integral roles in a variety of plant processes. More recently, it has become clear that these processes include some of the most basic pattern formation mechanisms needed to establish a functional plant body. Considerable insight into how this regulation plays out at the molecular level has been attained in recent years. Of special note are the complementary actions of the auxin efflux carrier proteins responsible for the formation of instructive auxin concentration gradients and the transcription factor complexes required for the appropriate interpretation of such instructions. The numerous players involved and the complexity of their regulation provide insight into how a single plant hormone can operate in such a multifunctional fashion. Many new features of auxin action can now be quantified and visualized, and three-dimensional models of auxin patterning can be tested and mathematically modeled. With these new advances, the developmental biology of auxin-mediated patterning has turned into a subject of plant systems biology research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207