Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In traditional Korean wooden buildings, purlins(dori) are longitudinal structural members which deliver load of roof to beams and columns. Among them, mid-purlins(jung-dori) determine the slope of sectional curve of the roof and at the same time closely engage with interior layout of the building. This study aims to investigate various factors affecting the position of mid-purlins as well as historic changes of the position itself and their result in the structure and design of the building, focusing on the 5-purlin type roof structure, which is the most common in traditional Korean wooden architecture. In general, mid-purlins are horizontally located at the points ranging from a quarter to one-third of the whole transverse building length inwards both from the front and back outer columns. What takes attention is that there is a sharp distinction in the position of mid-purlins between buildings built before 16th century and those built after 17th century. Moreover theses change is closely related with several unique compositional techniques in the traditional wooden architecture of the late Joseon dynast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it