MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168823658 · doi:10.3138/ijih.v5i3.28988

Disrupted Attachments: A Social Context Complex Trauma Framework and the Lives of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada

2009· article· en· W2168823658 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lori Haskell, Melanie Randall

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptualizationCognitive reframingColonialismContext (archaeology)ExpansiveEnvironmental ethicsSociologyPolitical scienceGender studiesSocial psychologyGeographyPsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of speaks to the multiple levels on which the historic and contemporary assaults on Aboriginal peoples in Canada have resonated. Not only have the policies of colonialism expressly aimed to sever the of Canada's First Nations to their land, customs, culture, modes of self-governance, languages and ways of life, but the traumatic impact of these disrupted attachments have reverberated through both the communities and through the individual lives of Aboriginal peoples in this country. The relatively new and more expansive conceptualization of in the mental health field has, as one of its core and defining features, in relationships with one's sense of self, as well as to relationships with others. We reframe the idea of alterations in relationships to that of to relationships to self and others, and situate these harms within the insights of theory. These harms to relationships can be usefully conceptualized as attachments. In this way then, the idea of attachment eloquently speaks to the myriad and fundamental ways in which the individuals and the communities comprising the Aboriginal peoples in Canada have been traumatized.To date, the nature and extent to which traumatic events and the ensuing trauma responses have shaped the lives of Aboriginal peoples in Canada is only partially and imperfectly understood and recognized. These traumas and their impacts are experienced at once collectively and individually. These impacts relate to historical and contemporary experiences of Aboriginal peoples and communities of Canada, and are centrally connected to being subject to policies and strategies of cultural assimilation and attempted cultural destruction. There has been a relative explosion, however, in the field of trauma and trauma studies in recent years. Most of this work has taken place in the traditional fields of psychology, psychiatry, neuroscience and medicine. Significant developments in these fields have helped to better understand the ways in which traumatic events can have far reaching and pervasive effects on people’s lives, and, in particular, have shed light on the way in which traumatic events in early childhood can seriously and negatively affect human development across cognitive, psychological, neurological and physical dimensions.This research, particularly when integrated into an expanded framework which takes account of social context, has great relevance for understanding important aspects of the lives of Aboriginal peoples. Given that the Aboriginal peoples of Canada have been subjected to centuries of genocidal state policies, and continue, in great numbers, to live in conditions characterized by relative deprivation and contexts of abuse, the insights of a trauma framework can help to illuminate the ways in which these traumatic events have shaped the lives of Aboriginal peoples at the individual as well as at the community levels. A traditional trauma framework is not broad enough to grasp the complexities and dimensions of these experiences. Instead, an expanded trauma framework that explicitly attends to and integrates an analysis of social context, including the social relations of inequality — race and ethnicity, socio-economic status, gender and sexuality, and abilities and disabilities — is necessary.We describe this approach as a social context complex trauma framework. More specifically, given the emergence of the new and important diagnostic category of complex post-traumatic stress, which describes the impact of traumatic events which are often ongoing and chronic, we discuss what we call a “social context complex traumatic stress framework” to analyze some of the dimensions of the lives and experiences of the peoples of Canada’s First Nations. In this paper, we explicate the contours of a social context complex trauma framework, building from the insights of the fields of psychology and neuroscience that are beginning to provide a fuller development of the pervasive and developmental impacts of trauma. We engage the important literature on historical trauma in relation to Aboriginal peoples, which seeks to identify the collective harms of trauma on entire communities and the ways in which these harms can be transmitted intergenerationally. Nevertheless, the dynamics of intergenerational transmission are inadequately described and explained in this literature. Rather, we argue that a social context complex trauma framework better fills in the gaps and provides a more complicated and multi-leveled way of understanding collective trauma in communities.In developing our conceptualization of a social context complex trauma framework, we draw on the foundational constructs from trauma theory, from theory, and from the insights of the literature on historical trauma, as well as the interdisciplinary research literature on the health and well-being of Aboriginal peoples in order to advance a developmental perspective, situated within a political analysis of social contexts of injustice and inequality. We further discuss some of the important ways in which this expanded conceptual framework can help to understand the ways in which experiences of trauma have shaped and harmed so many Aboriginal individuals and communities in Canada, and point to some directions for healing and transformation efforts. Most importantly, we speak to the need for a strengths-based trauma model and approach, which identifies and expands the resiliencies of the Aboriginal peoples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFrench-language works237,207