MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168854672 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.309

Localization of Electrical Outlet for a Mobile Robot Using Visual Servoing

2007· article· en· W2168854672 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Bustamante, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceVisual servoingComputer scienceRobotZoomRobot end effectorRobotic armMobile robotEngineeringLens (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the analysis, design, and the implementation of a system for detecting an electrical outlet that will allow a mobile robot to independently recharge its own energy supply. The system is implemented with a robotic arm, a zoom camera, a standard web camera and a laser distance sensor. Utilizing the eye-in-hand configuration the camera is mounted on end-effectors of the robotic arm. The image-based visual servo will control robot joint angles directly using measured image features. The image analysis is performed using Pattern algorithm. The robotic arm will start scanning the area trying to find an outlet. The system uses a template to be compared with the image coming from the camera; the zoom of the camera moves according to the distance of the object, which allows the system to compare with only one size template. Once the outlet has been identified, the coordinates x, y and z are sent to the robot. The robot will automatically move as close as necessary to the outlet then the robotic arm maneuvers using visual servoing until the plug face is perfectly aligned to the outlet; finally the plug/unplug system will be activated. Some simulation and experimental results will be given in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207