MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W21688712

Child behavior and maternal depressive mood during toddlerhood predict child adjustment after school entry

2011· dissertation· en· W21688712 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger E. Jansen

Bibliographic record

VenueHIV/AIDS policy & law review · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMoodDevelopmental psychologyDepressive symptomsClinical psychologyPsychiatryCognition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this 5-wave, multimethod, multi-informant study was to examine the longitudinal associations between child disruptive behavior and maternal depressive mood in toddlerhood. Adopting a transactional perspective on developmental psychopathology, the predictive value of these risk factors for child internalizing and externalizing problem behavior after school entry was investigated using multivariate latent growth curve modeling. The sample consisted of 162 toddlers (mean age 30 months), their mothers and teachers. Observed child disruptive behavior and self report of maternal depressive mood showed interrelated change. Level and growth in child disruptive behavior during toddlerhood predicted teacher’s report of both externalizing and internalizing problem behavior at school entry. Maternal depressive mood during toddlerhood showed a unique effect on child externalizing problems. The importance of targeting maternal depressive mood as well as toddlerhood disruptive behavior in preventive interventions in early childhood is emphasized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHIV/AIDS policy & law review→Same topicEarly Childhood Education and Development→French-language works237,207→