MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2168891303 · doi:10.1142/s0218127413500053

EIGHT LIMIT CYCLES AROUND A CENTER IN QUADRATIC HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM WITH THIRD-ORDER PERTURBATION

2013· article· en· W2168891303 on OpenAlexafffund
Pei Yu, Maoan Han

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsPerturbation (astronomy)Quadratic equationThird orderHamiltonian (control theory)PlanarAmplitudeComputationHamiltonian systemMathematical analysisLimit cycleLimit (mathematics)PhysicsGeometryMathematical optimizationQuantum mechanicsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that generic planar quadratic Hamiltonian systems with third degree polynomial perturbation can have eight small-amplitude limit cycles around a center. We use higher-order focus value computation to prove this result, which is equivalent to the computation of higher-order Melnikov functions. Previous results have shown, based on first-order and higher-order Melnikov functions, that planar quadratic Hamiltonian systems with third degree polynomial perturbation can have five or seven small-amplitude limit cycles around a center. The result given in this paper is a further improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos→Same topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems→French-language works237,207→