MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168925104 · doi:10.1109/pcicon.2000.882763

Design of increased safety electrical machine: development activities and certification testing

2002· article· en· W2168925104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsGeneral Electric (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationExplosive materialReliability engineeringAutomotive engineeringEngineeringSafeguardComputer scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrical machines are used widely in the petrochemical industry. Most of the machines are operated in Class I hazardous locations and hence appropriate precautions must be taken to protect the machine to ensure that the explosive atmosphere cannot be ignited. There are four types of protection applicable to large machines. They are type p (purged and pressurized), type e (increased safety), type d (flameproof) and type N. Type p, type e and type d protections are permitted in Zone 1 or Zone 2. In 1996 and 1999, two machines were designed and tested to meet IEC 60079-0 and 60079-7 standards regarding Exe II B 200/spl deg/C (T3) requirement. The machines are installed in Zone 2 locations. The paper presents the electrical and mechanical design consideration of the increased safety induction machine. Finally, the paper describes the test procedure and summarizes the results from the series of tests performed on these two machines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it