MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168925788 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2012-0354

Quantum chemical studies and molecular modeling of the effect of polyethylene glycol as corrosion inhibitors of an aluminum surface

2012· article· en· W2168925788 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed K. Awad

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryElectronegativityMolecular orbitalPolyethylene glycolHOMO/LUMOComputational chemistryPolymerAb initioPhysical chemistryMoleculeDipoleBasis setDensity functional theoryMolecular geometryCharge densityOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was shown that polyethylene glycol molecules act as good corrosion inhibitors. Quantum chemical simulation showed the effect of molecular weight on studying polymers with repeating units 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and also polymers with high molecular weights with repeating units 10, 20, and 30. Using the density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p) basis set level, ab initio calculations using the HF/6-31G+(d,p) and semi-empirical PM3 methods were performed on polyethylene glycol to investigate the correlation between its molecular structure and the corresponding inhibition efficiency. The calculated parameters include the highest occupied molecular orbital, the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, the separation energy (ΔE), the dipole moment (μ), the softness (σ), the fraction of electrons transferred from the inhibitor to the metal surface (ΔN), the electronegativity (χ), the hardness (η), and the total negative charge. Furthermore, the adsorption energies of the inhibitors with the aluminum (1 1 1) surface were studied using the molecular dynamic method. A good correlation between the theoretical data and the experimental results was found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207