MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2168958989 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2011.6033211

A multi-state model of cortical memory

2011· article· en· W2168958989 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Philippe Thivierge, Frédéric Dandurand, Denis Cousineau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCégep Marie-Victorin
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacaqueComputer scienceCortex (anatomy)Property (philosophy)NeuroscienceInformation flowPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fundamental property of cortical pathways is the ability to retain information beyond time-delimited environmental events. Here, we propose that the neural connectivity between different regions of cortex directly contributes to the preservation of memory traces. A structural network of macaque cortex was obtained from the CoCoMac database. A computational model was then employed to simulate the flow of information between regions of interest (ROIs). This model assigned discrete states to each of 47 ROIs, and allowed exchanges between ROIs as well as random memory decay over time. The rate at which memory decayed over time depended on the network topology; it was found to be markedly less in primate cortex than in a random connectivity that preserved the experimental degree distribution. These results suggest that evolutionary constraints may promote a large-scale cortical anatomy that is optimized for the continuity of memory in time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→