The Impact of Electrolyte Additives Determined Using Isothermal Microcalorimetry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Isothermal microcalorimetry is a quick and simple method of determining the effect an additive or additive combination has on the parasitic reactions occurring as a function of state of charge. It can easily discriminate exactly where in the voltage range the additive is providing a benefit with just a single cycle. As a demonstrative example, the effect of varying concentrations of vinylene carbonate (VC) on a LiCoO2/graphite cell is examined. Machine-made pouch cells were used such that the cells were nominally identical except for the concentration of VC. The measured heat flow for the different cells is then identical except for the heat flow that results from parasitic reactions. It is shown that the presence of VC reduces parasitic reactions above 3.9 V, and continues to reduce these reactions with increasing state of charge. The heat flow during open circuit conditions at the top of charge also shows that the presence of VC dramatically reduces the heat due to parasitic reactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it