Évaluation de la tolérance du <i>Thuja occidentalis</i> L. et de huit de ses cultivars aux conditions climatiques du nord-est canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Six successive plantations of Thuja occidentalis L. (from 1985 to 1990) were transplanted in different sites corresponding to different northeast Canadian climatic zones (2 to 5). Five cultivars of this species were planted in 1985 and three other cultivars in 1986. These plants were observed over a 5-yr period to validate the climatic zonal range attributed to the species and to determine the winterhardiness of the cultivars. Winter damage observed each spring indicated that Thuja occidentalis L. can survive in climatic conditions more severe than those suggested in the literature. However, survival varies among the cultivars studied. Woodwardii, Reidii, Wareana and Lutea showed a winterhardiness similar to the species. Pulcherrima showed the most damage. Little Champion, Smaragd and Fastigiata cultivars gave a response between the two other groups. Furthermore, growth in terms of height and width of the species and each cultivar was influenced by the different climatic conditions of each location. Key words: Thuja occidentalis L., hardiness, winter damages, growth, origin, cultivars
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".