MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169081015 · doi:10.1109/78.815500

Matrix filter design using semi-infinite programming with application to DOA estimation

2000· article· en· W2169081015 on OpenAlex
Zhiwen Zhu, Wang Shi, Henry Leung, Zhen Ding

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopbandFilter designPassbandElliptic filterConvex optimizationControl theory (sociology)Filter (signal processing)MathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)Butterworth filterLinear matrix inequalityPrototype filterComputer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmElectronic engineeringBand-pass filterRegular polygonEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose using a semi-infinite programming technique to design a matrix filter. The idea is to formulate the design problem into a semi-infinite optimization model where the mean square error between the desired response and the designed filter in the passband and stopband is minimized subject to a set of nonlinear functional inequalities. These inequality constraints are used to ensure that the stopband attenuation and the passband deviation satisfy the prescribed specifications. Simulations showed that the proposed method was better than the conventional matrix filter design techniques. The matrix filters based on the proposed design method was also applied to the direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation problem. It was shown that the filter greatly improved the estimation accuracy at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.815

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it