Cardiomyopathy in congenital complete lipodystrophy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular genetic studies have pointed to a relationship between congenital lipodystrophy syndromes and some cardiac disorders. For instance, mutations in LMNA cause either lipodystrophy or cardiomyopathy, indicating that different mutations in the same gene can produce these clinical syndromes. The present authors describe a 10-year-old female with Berardinelli-Seip congenital complete lipodystrophy (MIM 606158) caused by homozygosity for a frameshift mutation in BSCL2. In addition to the typical attributes of complete lipodystrophy, this subject had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosed in the first year of her life; its progress has been followed with non-invasive imaging. The mechanism underlying the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in complete lipodystrophy is unclear. It may result from a direct effect of the mutant gene or it might be secondary to the effects of hyperinsulinemia on cardiac development. The variability of the associated cardiomyopathy in patients with complete generalized lipodystrophy may be caused by differential effects of mutations in the same gene or of mutations in different genes which underlie the lipodystrophy phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it