Cardiomyopathy in congenital complete lipodystrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular genetic studies have pointed to a relationship between congenital lipodystrophy syndromes and some cardiac disorders. For instance, mutations in LMNA cause either lipodystrophy or cardiomyopathy, indicating that different mutations in the same gene can produce these clinical syndromes. The present authors describe a 10-year-old female with Berardinelli-Seip congenital complete lipodystrophy (MIM 606158) caused by homozygosity for a frameshift mutation in BSCL2. In addition to the typical attributes of complete lipodystrophy, this subject had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosed in the first year of her life; its progress has been followed with non-invasive imaging. The mechanism underlying the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in complete lipodystrophy is unclear. It may result from a direct effect of the mutant gene or it might be secondary to the effects of hyperinsulinemia on cardiac development. The variability of the associated cardiomyopathy in patients with complete generalized lipodystrophy may be caused by differential effects of mutations in the same gene or of mutations in different genes which underlie the lipodystrophy phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".