MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169093066 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2012.6317818

Novel process flow and cell architecture for 10 µm thick membrane single-crystalline silicon solar cell

2012· article· en· W2169093066 on OpenAlexafffund
Erik Janssen, R. N. Kleiman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPassivationSolar cellMaterials scienceOpen-circuit voltageOptoelectronicsSiliconPhotovoltaic systemPhotovoltaicsFabricationLithographyEnergy conversion efficiencyNanotechnologyVoltageElectrical engineeringLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultra-thin single-crystalline (sc-Si) solar cells are one possible route towards the goal of low-cost high-efficiency photovoltaics. The main motivation for such solar cells is cost-reduction due to the drastic reduction of high-purity silicon required for fabrication. This reduction is typically an order of magnitude from that of conventional cells, while still maintaining a reasonable efficiency. In this work, novel ultra-thin solar cells were fabricated on a large-area 10 μm thick sc-Si free standing membrane using a novel lithography-free laboratory process that is simpler and more versatile than that reported elsewhere. The procedure allows for high temperature front and rear-side processing and is ideal as a base process flow for further investigation of ultra-thin sc-Si cells. The initial un-optimized solar cell fabricated using this process flow achieved an efficiency of 6.6% via a fill factor of 0.71, a short circuit current of 17.0 mA cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-2</sup> and an open circuit voltage of 0.54 V. Further improvements are anticipated with the incorporation of an antireflection coating, thin film surface passivation and a rearreflector or surface texture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207