MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169098106 · doi:10.1139/t04-049

A large landslide in Zigui County, Three Gorges area

2004· article· en· W2169098106 on OpenAlexaffvenue
F.C. Dai, Jing Deng, L.G. Tham, KT Law, C F Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideGeologyBeddingRockslideGeotechnical engineeringBedOil shaleThree gorgesGeomorphologySlip (aerodynamics)Hydrology (agriculture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 13 July 2003, a landslide with a volume of approximately 20 × 10 6 m 3 occurred on the left bank of the Qinggan River, Zigui County, Hubei Province, China. As a result, 14 people died and 10 people are missing. A landslide dam was formed, blocking the Qinggan River. A channelized diversion was constructed for prevention of upstream flooding and damage downstream caused by dam breaching. The landslide was a typical translational rockslide in weathered shale and sandstone, a block of which slipped down along the bedding plane. It is estimated that the landslide was caused by the combined effect of the following factors: (i) a bedding plane between incompetent weathered shale and competent sandstone that daylights at or is shallowly buried at the bottom of the Qinggan River; (ii) a thin layer of clayey soil acting as the slip plane that is likely a preexisting shear surface; (iii) excavation of the shale as raw material for brick fabricating on the slope; and (iv) a combination of prolonged rainfall and reservoir impounding.Key words: landslide, landslide dam, rainfall, impounding, Three Gorges area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207