Electronically reconfigurable uni‐planar antenna for cognitive radio applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A single port, electronically reconfigurable, uni‐planar antenna for cognitive‐radio (CR) systems is presented. This design effectively merges the time‐domain properties of tapered slot antennas with uni‐planar nature of coplanar waveguide (CPW). Two tapered slot antennas were excited through a CPW, which is embedded with a PIN diode controlled band‐pass filter. The prototype fabricated on Rogers ® RO3006 high‐frequency laminate with dielectric constant 6.5, loss tangent 0.002 and thickness 1.28 mm facilitates S 11 < −10 dB bandwidth from 1.6 to 6.0 GHz in the wide‐band mode and 3.39 to 3.80 GHz in the narrow‐band mode. The measured radiation characteristics show that the design is suitable for CR applications, in which a wide‐band antenna is used for spectrum sensing and a narrow‐band antenna for transmission. In addition, the measured time‐domain characteristics of the antenna including group delay, impulse response and fidelity factor are presented. These indicate that the proposed antenna can also be used for microwave imaging devices that are connected to the host through high‐speed worldwide interoperability for microwave access terminals. Finally, to assist antenna engineers working on industrial design, the housing effect on the prototype was also studied experimentally in frequency and time domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it