MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169149454 · doi:10.7202/009629ar

Les familles recomposées homoparentales et hétéroparentales

2004· article· fr· W2169149454 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Line Chamberland, Émilie Jouvin, Danielle Julien

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCollège de MaisonneuveUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tout en soulignant la diversité des familles homoparentales, cet article situe brièvement leur émergence dans l’historique des changements ayant affecté la famille dans les dernières décennies, notamment la multiplication des situations de pluriparentalité. Il propose ensuite une typologie des recompositions familiales selon le sexe et l’orientation sexuelle des parents. Enfin, à partir d’une recension des recherches empiriques existantes, il compare les familles recomposées homoparentales et hétéroparentales sur quatre dimensions : a) l’expérience de la séparation et du divorce ; b) les rôles sociaux et les relations dans la famille ; c) l’affirmation de l’orientation sexuelle (coming out) vis-à-vis des enfants ; d) la santé et l’adaptation psychosociale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207