MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169165793 · doi:10.1190/geo2011-0172.1

Seismic data interpolation and denoising in the frequency-wavenumber domain

2012· article· en· W2169165793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)WavenumberFrequency domainAlgorithmRange (aeronautics)Noise reductionDomain (mathematical analysis)GridMathematicsFunction (biology)Least-squares function approximationComputer scienceMathematical analysisOpticsGeometryStatisticsPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT I introduce a unified approach for denoising and interpolation of seismic data in the frequency-wavenumber (f-k) domain. First, an angular search in the f-k domain is carried out to identify a sparse number of dominant dips, not only using low frequencies but over the whole frequency range. Then, an angular mask function is designed based on the identified dominant dips. The mask function is utilized with the least-squares fitting principle for optimal denoising or interpolation of data. The least-squares fit is directly applied in the time-space domain. The proposed method can be used to interpolate regularly sampled data as well as randomly sampled data on a regular grid. Synthetic and real data examples are provided to examine the performance of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it