MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169166133 · doi:10.1109/icc.2005.1494566

Fine-granularity loading schemes using adaptive Reed-Solomon coding for discrete multitone modulation systems

2005· article· en· W2169166133 on OpenAlexaff
S. Panigrahi, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGranularityComputer scienceLink adaptationRoundingAlgorithmCoding (social sciences)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingMathematicsDecoding methodsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a fine granularity loading scheme using joint optimization of modulation and coding for discrete multitone (DMT) modulation towards achieving maximum information rate conveyed. While most existing algorithms strived for the optimal energy distribution to maximize rate, the bits loaded were always constrained to integers. It was initially believed that most (not all) of the granularity losses could be recovered through 'bit-rounding' and 'energy re-scaling' after an optimal 'water-filling' approach. But this was observed only for the total power constrained case. With the advent of peak power constraint, we show that the room for optimization in the energy domain severely constrained and granularity losses constitute a significant percentage of the achievable data rate. To recover these losses, we propose a loading scheme that integrates the coding scheme with the bit-loading algorithm. For achieving near-continuous rate adaptation, the family of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes has been used for their low redundancy, high flexibility in correction capability and highly programmable architecture. Simulation results with very high bit rate digital subscriber line (VDSL)-DMT system show more than 20% improvement in most cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207