MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169204887 · doi:10.1177/0022022109346957

Amae and Mardy

2009· article· en· W2169204887 on OpenAlexaff
J. Rees Lewis, Ritsuko Ozaki

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAffectionMeaning (existential)PsychologyDivergence (linguistics)Expression (computer science)Social psychologyJapanese languageLinguisticsEpistemologyPhilosophyComputer sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Japanese term amae , referring to a need to receive affection, is compared to a Midland English dialect word, mardy, meaning soft or spoilt. An interpretative phenomenological analysis conducted within the framework of the componential model of emotion indicates areas of overlap and divergence between these two terms that reflect the attitudes toward dependence within the two cultural contexts. Antecedents are similar, as are some of the elements of subjective experience and emotional expression. Both are more or less appropriate in similar relationships. However, mardiness is less acceptable than amae: The former may be universal, but it is considered childish and therefore unacceptable; the latter may be childish, but it is considered human and is more often treated sympathetically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cross-Cultural PsychologySame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207